Prince George's County D9 Politico Blog

Keeping politicians accountable and voters informed.

Rushern Baker and Ethics Reform — Serious or Scam?‏

with 2 comments

Thanks to pg-politics for sharing.
Where’s the beef IG?

Candidate Rushern Baker’s “30-day plan” as published in the Post Voters Guide and summarized in the Gazette Voters Guide (see below) contained at least an implied promise to act within 30 days on the establishment of an Inspector General.  Mr. Baker also promised several additional reforms:

  • Prohibit County Credit Cards for Elected Officials (by executive order)
  • Prohibit Gifts, Meals and Beverages for County Officials (by executive order)
  • Transparent Government Online  (by executive order)
  • County Council Slates (by county ordinance)
  • County Council Lobbyists (by county ordinance)
  • Contractors reports of campaign contributions (by county ordinance)

Not counting the day of his inauguration he had until 6 Jan 2011 to act on those promises.

  • That means he had over seven months to come up with specific plans, executive orders, and proposed ordinances for submission to the county council.
  • He had almost four months from the time he won the primary election to come up with specific plans, executive orders, and proposed ordinances for submission to the county council.
  • He had about two months from the time he won the general election to come up with specific plans, executive orders, and proposed ordinances for submission to the county council.
  • He had almost 50 days from from the time his predecessor and an incoming council member were arrested to come up with specific plans, executive orders, and proposed ordinances for submission to the county council.

So what did Mr.Baker actually do? None of what he promised!

Instead of putting forward specific plans and promulgating executive orders or sending the council proposed ordinances, Mr. Baker took the road followed by too many politicians who want to avoid dealing with tough issues or want cover for breaking their promises–he established a task force to try to hide his failure to act.

Baker’s task force took almost 6 months to draft a report, and came up with the kind of preliminary recommendations that should have been ready long before Baker’s inauguration.  The report did not propose any specifics that could actually be promulgated by the county executive or submitted to the council for enactment.

Writing recently in the Examiner, six weeks after the task force report was submitted, Ben Giles reported that the task force has had no feedback since submitting its report and Baker’s staff says it might be months, possibly not until fiscal 2013, before an Inspector General is appointed, if ever.

Repeating the question: Rushern Baker and Ethics Reform — Serious or Scam?

The lack of any meaningful action by Mr. Baker seems to answer more loudly than the empty words that have come out of his propaganda machine.  It is unfortunate that, except for Mr. Giles, the media seems to have been bamboozled by Mr. Baker’s rhetoric and hasn’t bothered to look beyond it or made any attempt to follow up on or hold him accountable for his promises.

Earlier:


Excerpt from candidate Rushern Baker’s “30-day plan” as published in the Post Voters Guide on the establishment of an Inspector General.  See my January 14, 2011, posting for the full plan and comments on progress at that time. There has been no substantive progress on the county controlled aspects of the plan since then.

RUSHERNBAKER2010
RAISING OUR STANDARDS
The First Thirty Days as County Executive Thru:
Executive Order
Introduction of Legislation to the County Council
Introduction of Legislation to the House of Delegates
***
Inspector General

The County will create an office of Inspector General to investigate waste, fraud, abuse, mismanagement and conflicts-of-interest in the County government. The Inspector General must be professionally qualified with a background in auditing and public financial management. The Inspector General must be selected based on ability and integrity, without regard to political affiliation. The Inspector General will be appointed by the County Executive and confirmed by the County Council for a fixed term of office that is staggered and non-concurrent with the Executive and Council. The office of inspector general will have its own staff and will enjoy subpoena power. The Inspector General will conduct investigations, review financial managements, examine potential conflicts-of-interest, conduct performance audits and similar reviews, make recommendations, public findings, and make referrals to law enforcement agencies. The Inspector General will also conduct annual ethics audits of locally elected officials and make results public.

[Can be accomplished by county ordinance.]

And Mr. Baker told the Gazette Voters Guide

Much more needs to be done to open government. Major ethics reform is long overdue in Prince George’s County, I will end pay for play practices in government business dealings. I believe in full disclosure and my campaign posts a list of its donors every sixty days. I have also released a comprehensive list of initiatives I will take in my first thirty days. As County Executive I will strive to make government and campaigns more transparent. I also pledge to establish a first ever County Inspector General to police ethics conduct and perform annual ethics audits.

Advertisements

Written by pgd9politico

August 11, 2011 at 12:49 pm

Posted in County Executive

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. These are good questions. I’m proud of you. Mr. Baker needs to be made accountable for his promises. We can not afford an executive who flips….

    Examiner

    August 11, 2011 at 7:21 pm

  2. We also need CE Baker to feel the power of the Electorate as stronger than the power of the checkbook or the bureaucracy. I’ve watched Baker make a few, rather hesitant, new appointments to his Administration, but keep too many old hands, and I think that his team struggles to know how to bring the accountability that Baker talked about — and, yes, CONTINUES to espouse. I may be naive, but I do want to believe that his intention really IS to bring positive changes about. In fairness to the guy, he has been hit with FBI investigation of his predecessor, criminal charges against one of his local legislators, an enormous snowfall event, the financial collapse in the US economy, and now, a rare East Coast earthquake and what promises to be a flooding event of historic proportions thanks to Hurricane Irene. Not ONLY that, but many of the people who need to be shown the door in the County government, are not going gently. People hate change when it affects their livelihood and their way of doing work. I don’t like the pace of change so far any more than others here do. We need a way to “make him do it” just as FDR needed people to insist that needed programs were launched many years ago.

    Linda Saffell

    August 26, 2011 at 1:11 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: